You cannot decree women to be sexually free when they are not economically free.
If you ask a young man his thoughts about being a gigolo, he would likely reply with some scorn that this isn’t a role for a “real man” and that the man who does take up such a role must not be good for anything else. The same young man, however, would be pleased if his sister were dating a rich man who was generous with her, even if that rich man was of questionable physical appeal and devoid of personality.
If you asked the same young man what he would think of finding a rich woman to marry, he would likely reply with some variation on the aphorism, “The man who marries for money earns it.”
For the man who thought of this homily, it was, perhaps, an insight. For women, however, marrying money and then having to “earn” it is a fact of life that every girl of sixteen has already considered to be a clear and present option as well as a clear and present danger. If she marries for money, she expects to earn it. She is expected to give up control of her life in exchange for a comfortable lifestyle which will be afforded her as long as she submits to her husband’s will.
The young man who arbitrarily rejects a money marriage for himself sees no inconsistency in his profound hope that his cherished little sister will have a “good” marriage, which means a marriage to a man of means even if he is a little dull. For the woman of few resources, a husband to take care of things may be the only solution. With limited education and paltry self-confidence, it may well be better for her to marry for money than to work for peanuts.
If a woman is financially dependent upon a man, she is in his power, no matter how generous he is with her. It’s the degree of financial dependence which determines, in large part, the degree of power. Women need to obtain their own resources and to be content to live on them, however modest. If they can achieve a minimum standard of living for themselves, then sexual barter is not necessary.
If a woman has sexual freedom and has a degree of financial and social independence, then she has a new option. She has the luxury of choosing someone to love, and perhaps to marry, not because he is rich and not because he desires her, but because she desires him. Or better still because they desire each other.
Billie Holiday says it well when she sings ruefully, “Mama may have, Papa may have, but God blessed the child who’s got her own.”
- Your Take: Would You Marry for Money? (bargaineering.com)
- For love or for money? (jimbocyberdoc.wordpress.com)
- Tameka Foster: I’m No Gold Digger! (thehollywoodgossip.com)
- A Gold-Diggers Karma! (anjiray.wordpress.com)
- Day 17 ~ 30 Days Of Thankfulness 2012 (marvimarti.com)
- “Traditional Marriage” Advocate Scott DesJarlais Cheated On Wife, Encouraged Abortion (queerty.com)
- What Women Look For In A Man They Would Marry! (wycd.cbslocal.com)
- Steve Harvey Says I have A Gold Mine, and I Agree! (dietynyota.wordpress.com)